Help
Aids Top
Application: To establish equivalence, you can consider the following hypotheses:
Procedure:
a) value of α, the probability of type I error
b) value of β, the probability of type II error
c)
value of θ, a true mean response rate of a test drug
d) value of θ0, a reference response rate
e) value of δ, the equivalence limit.
Formula:
(*)
Notations:
α: The
probability of type I error (significance level) is the probability of rejecting the true null
hypothesis.
β: The
probability of type II error (1 – power of the test) is the probability of
failing to reject the false null hypothesis.
θ-θ0: The difference between the true mean response rates of a test drug (θ) and a reference value (θ0).
δ: Clinically meaningful difference. The largest change from the reference value (baseline) that is considered to be trivial.
Examples
Example 1:
We consider that one brand name drug for
osteoporosis on the market has a responder rate of 60%. It is believed that a δ=20% difference in responder rate is of
no clinical significance. Hence, the investigator wants to show the study drug
is equivalent to the market drug in term of responder rate. If the true
responder rate is θ0=65%,
by (*), at α=0.05, assuming that the
true response rate is θ=60%, then the
required sample size for having an 80% power (i.e., β=0.2) is N=92.
Reference: